Social Media

How do ballistic missiles work and what’s their range?

时间:2010-12-5 17:23:32  作者:Interviews   来源:Innovation  查看:  评论:0
内容摘要:There is a reckoning under way. Like most reckonings, big or small, near or distant, it can be messy and painful.

There is a reckoning under way. Like most reckonings, big or small, near or distant, it can be messy and painful.

This is the danger of media-driven identity construction. Once the Other becomes a caricature, dialogue dies. Diplomacy becomes weakness. Compromise becomes betrayal. And war becomes not just possible, but desirable.The image of the Other also determined who was considered a victim and who was not.

How do ballistic missiles work and what’s their range?

While missiles flew, people died. Civilians in Kashmir, on both sides, were killed. Border villages were shelled. Religious sites damaged. Innocent people displaced. But these stories, the human stories, were buried beneath the rubble of rhetoric.In both countries, the media didn’t mourn equally. Victims were grieved if they were ours. Theirs? Collateral. Or fabricated. Or forgotten.This selective mourning is a moral indictment. Because when we only care about our dead, we become numb to justice. And in that numbness, violence becomes easier the next time.

How do ballistic missiles work and what’s their range?

The battle for legitimacyWhat was at stake during the India-Pakistan confrontation wasn’t just territory or tactical advantage. It was legitimacy. Both states needed to convince their own citizens, and the world, that they were on the right side of history.

How do ballistic missiles work and what’s their range?

Indian media leaned on the global “war on terror” frame. By targeting Pakistan-based militants, India positioned itself as a partner in global security. Sound familiar? It should. It’s the same playbook used by the United States in Iraq and Israel in Gaza. Language like “surgical”, “precision”, and “pre-emptive” doesn’t just describe, it absolves.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s media leaned on the moral weight of sovereignty. India’s strikes were framed as an assault not just on land, but on izzat, honour. By invoking sacred spaces, by publicising civilian casualties, Pakistan constructed India not as a counterterrorist actor but as a bully and a blasphemer.The attacks on healthcare facilities were part of a wider campaign to damage civilian infrastructure in the West Bank, the Forensic Architecture report said, using armoured bulldozers, controlled demolitions and air attacks.

Researchers said they verified more than 200 examples of Israeli soldiers deliberately destroying buildings and street networks in all four of the refugee camps with armoured bulldozers reducing civilian roads to barely passable piles of exposed earth and rubble.Civilian property, including parked vehicles, food carts and agricultural buildings, such as greenhouses, were also destroyed during Israeli military operations, they said.

Afghan villagers struggle years after US dropped ‘mother of all bombs’Villagers in a remote corner of Afghanistan’s Nangarhar province are still struggling with the aftermath of the US military’s most destructive non-nuclear bomb over eight years after it was dropped.

copyright © 2016 powered by BroadwayInsider   sitemap