Aldi US didn't respond to the BBC's request for comment, but its British counterpart stressed that it is not involved in the lawsuit.
Ms Curtis said the feedback on her work "has been overwhelmingly positive"."I love that the design features local houses, the church and wildlife from the meadow and river - it makes it feel really personal."
When Shamili left her home in India's Bengaluru city on Wednesday, it wasn't to see her favourite cricket team - she isn't even a fan of the game.But the buzz around the Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB's) Indian Premier League victory parade - the home teamfor the first time - had swept through the city like wildfire.
Wearing an RCB jersey with "18 Virat" on the back - a nod to Virat Kohli, the city's favourite cricket icon - Shamili joined her sister and friends near the Chinnaswamy Stadium, looking forward to celebrations.What she didn't expect was to get caught in a terrifying crush.
The victory parade turned deadly when surging crowds - far beyond what authorities expected - led to a
and injured dozens more.This is not the first time Aldi has been embroiled in a trademark battle. Earlier this year, it lost a battle with Cider producers Thatchers, which accused the supermarket of copying its drink in "taste and appearance".
TikTok users are selling food without listing allergen information, the BBC has found.Listings on TikTok Shop show people selling snacks and sweets without highlighting they contain one of the 14 main allergens that UK businesses are legally required to declare.
When the BBC brought these listings to TikTok's attention, it deleted them and said: "TikTok Shop is committed to providing a safe and trustworthy shopping experience."Simon Williams, chief executive of Anaphylaxis UK, warned allergy suffers: "If the ingredient and allergen information isn't there, don't buy it. You're putting your life in grave danger."