He fled into the crowd as the police line advanced, then ran back to the front and resumed his torrent of abuse when officers stopped, Mr Ahmad said.
He added that Mencap believes initial conversations would have to be "incredibly well supported and structured" with an advocate present.MPs backed proposals to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales in November, by a majority of 55.
However, it will be debated further by the House of Commons and Lords later in the year, and will require the approval of both before it becomes law.A committee of MPs is expected to begin line-by-line scrutiny of the bill on 11 February and further changes could be proposed.For the first time in almost a decade, MPs will vote on Friday on giving terminally ill adults in England and Wales the right to have an assisted death. While it’s something that remains illegal in most countries, more than 300 million people now live in countries which have legalised assisted dying.
Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Spain and Austria have all introduced assisted dying laws since 2015 – when UK MPs last voted on the issue – some allowing assisted death for those who are not terminally ill.The proposed bill in England and Wales comes with safeguards supporters say will make it the strictest set of rules in the world, with patients needing the approval of a High Court judge. Critics on the other hand say changing the law would be a dangerous step that would place the vulnerable at risk. They argue the focus should be on improving patchy access to palliative care.
Ahead of Friday's vote, we look at assisted dying laws in North America, Europe and Australasia.
Across the US, assisted dying - which some critics prefer to call assisted suicide - is legal in 10 states, as well as in Washington DC. Oregon was one of the first places in the world to offer help to die for some patients, in 1997, and so has more than 25 years’ experience. It has become the model on which other US assisted dying laws have been framed.for Trump's presidency, which was authored by figures who are now key White House staff, recommended withdrawal from both institutions and termination of financial contributions.
It said the institutions "espouse economic theories and policies that are inimical to American principles of free market and limited government principles."Following a White House executive order, all international intergovernmental organisations of which the US is a member will be reviewed to determine if they are "contrary to the interests of the US" and "can be reformed".
The six month review may then provide recommendations for withdrawal to President Trump.Sources in the G20, or Group of Twenty - a club of countries that meets to discuss global economic and political issues - said that during his first term, Trump's team suggested abolishing the IMF at the 2018 Buenos Aires Summit.